[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Home]
Re: what is analytic?
- To: bups-dis@bups.org
- Subject: Re: what is analytic?
- From: Robert Charleston <rc3673@student.open.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:04:57 +0100 (BST)
- In-reply-to: <fc.000f551804b0febe3b9aca0036be66e5.4b0fec1@oufcnt1.open.ac.uk>
- References: <fc.000f551804b0febe3b9aca0036be66e5.4b0fec1@oufcnt1.open.ac.uk>
To reply to this message or start a new topic please email: BUPS-DIS@bups.org
Hi Ralph,
Don't worry - if we had a preference you would have been told!
The phrase was meant to indicate that:
i) we were not limiting the topics of papers to exclude continental
philosophy (in fact we have a couple of papers on Derrida already
submitted, and these will be considered with the others)
ii) but we do want the papers to be argued using 'normal' (for want of a
better word) analytic methods of premises, conditions, conclusion etc
rather than some of the more esoteric methods of critical theory, for
example.
BUPS has no agenda to push on this. If we did it would be listed as one of
our aims. The (hopefully quite light) limits represented in ii) above were
set for pragmatic reasons -
1. the assessors for the papers have to be university staff, and the
people we could beg/borrow/bully into being our assessors in the short
amount of time we had this year all happened to be analytic by training.
Several have interests in the continental side of things, though, and one
of the invited respondents at the conference is a continental philosopher
through and through.
2. Most UK philosophy undergrads (by a wide margin - we checked with most
of the 53 philosophy departments in the UK) are trained in analytic
techniques. At a mixed conference, continental topics therefore need to be
presented in a way that can be understood by the majority of undergrads
only trained in the analytic tradition. Just to pluck an example out of
the air, if you are utilising one of the several theoretical stances that
put aside bivalence, this will need to be explicitly explained as most
undergrads have been taught that this is something they can take for
granted. We would like to put on continental events that do not have to
conform to this pragmatic limit, and need people with the requisite skills
to get in touch.
We are here to put philosophy undergrads of all creeds in touch with one
another. If you are a specifically contintental philosopher and would like
to get involved with the BUPS committee, or can spread the word, or even
have suggestions for continental-themed philosophy events you'd like to
see organised, please email me privately.
I hope that helps,
Rab.
---
Chair, BUPS
Browse or search the BUPS-DIS archives, or unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.bups.org/mailinglist.htm