[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Home]

Re: in real terms, where do u stand?



To reply to this message or start a new topic please email: BUPS-DIS@bups.org


Greetings,

Alice-

I'm not sure that dealing with the problems people have once they become drug-addicts is going to solve the problem of people becoming drug-addicts in the first place.
In fact I would have thought that it would make such a 'life-style' (if I'm not being too crass to use that word) less unappealing than it already is.
I'm all for helping those who need help. However, we can plug all the holes on the bottom of the ship but, unless we deal with the termites we're eventually going to be overwhelmed- metaphorically speaking, of course, lol.
I'm not sure that helping 'druggies' to become better and safer 'druggies' is much of an improvement when compared to helping 'druggies' to get clean. Sure, it's a nice idea but, we shouldn't be satisfied with it and think that it's the answer to the problem.


Respectfully,

Luis Johnstone.

Alice Evans wrote:

To reply to this message or start a new topic please email: BUPS-DIS@bups.org


** For Your Eyes Only **

ok, druggies, (just joshing), in practical terms, how do u guys feel about legalisation?

the case for is that in the current climate drug users are often trapped in an ugly underworld of crime etc. but legalisation would allow for regulation, protecting those who are effectively forced into such patterns by current law. its analogous to the argument for legalising prostitution. in countries were prostitution is illegal the girl (im not being presumptuous and sexist, it just generally is), lacking state protection is forced to look to her pimp for protection, he then has ultimate control over her and she's buggered, no pun intended. she cant make claims against her pimp because to report any offence would first require that she admit to being a prostitute, in finland, any suspected prostitute immigrant is immediately deported, hence the government is effectively endorsing this subculture of violence, dependence, exploitation and abuse.

government run centres where heroin addicts could inject themselves would also provide clean places etc, no sharing filthy needles etc. and if it was dispensed by nurses then ppl could be weaned off. couple this with greater education etc. and bingo?

i guess the argument against is that it sends out the wrong message etc.

so, chaps, thoughts?



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.



Browse or search the BUPS-DIS archives, or unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.bups.org/mailinglist.htm







Browse or search the BUPS-DIS archives, or unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.bups.org/mailinglist.htm