[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Home]
Philosophy and film
- To: BUPS-DIS@bups.org
- Subject: Philosophy and film
- From: nj8 <nj8@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:43:51 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
To reply to this message or start a new topic please email: BUPS-DIS@bups.org
I'm a little late out of the blocks on this.
Seems to me there are two distinct questions here. One is about the
philosophy of film, which involves not merely questions of aesthetic
value, but also issues of genre, representation, the nature of seeing in
film etc etc. See Greg Currie's Image and Mind, or George Wilson's
Narration in Light as instances of this, or articles in Greg's Art and
Minds, or the Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, Oxford Handbook of
Aesthetics, etc.
The second question is about films that encourage debate about
philosophical questions (including perhaps, debates about the philosophy
of film ... some Godard might be an example of the latter). About three
years ago I set up a season of films at Nottingham University
(originally called the Cartesian Cinema) to encourage this sort of
debate. We showed, inter alia:
Pi
The Matrix
eXistenZ
Memento
Dark City
Bladerunner
Rashomon
Do The Right Thing
Possible Worlds
Wittgenstein
All of me
Crimes and Misdemeanours
John Campbell suggested we show Total Recall, but we never got around to
it...the season still continues, sporadically, as Films for Thought, but
no longer organised by me.
Nick
Browse or search the BUPS-DIS archives, or unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.bups.org/mailinglist.htm