[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Home]
any views on book reviews
- To: bups <bups-dis@bups.org>
- Subject: any views on book reviews
- From: andrew stephenson <winstonmarx@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:49:49 +0000 (GMT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vEJTtt4xnJsYBQTaGM9XCwyTSPnGAyJur1a6+uBLiyA87epBc0+G6AcraQYAuByxYZwLg/qfJxwoYdd+U6Vx8ZAwTGTqGdvlN3kmH/Grz6EZLAhDqiRaYMod2KQ9U4VUZQjXVxeTW8CEEe79SjluAePq+ldDzS4b4crNQHVTuIE= ;
hi all,
i was just wondering whether any of you had any opinions on the style a book review should take. I am undertaking to write one soon and i am not sure how to proceed. really i am asking for advice on what book to choose. i'm (broadly but not exclusively) a continentalist which generally means the books i focus on were written ages ago. sure, some commentries are contemporary, but they just aint as interesting or fun to write about. But is there any point in writing a book review about an old canonical classic when so many have probably been done already...hmmm. i want to write about Derrida's Of Grammatology but it was published nearly forty years ago!
so...tell me hmm
cheers,
andy.
Yahoo! Photos ? NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo.