[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Home]
True Love
- To: BUPS-DIS@bups.org
- Subject: True Love
- From: fnb20@bath.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:32:47 +0100
- Content-disposition: inline
- User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4)
To reply to this message or start a new topic please email: BUPS-DIS@bups.org
Sorry if this topic is a bit out of date, but I have some interesting
trivia regarding the 'folk biology/psychology' aspect out of which the
ideology of true love and soul mates derives:
The pre-socratic philosopher Empedocles (c. 492-432 BC) spoke of two
fundamental cosmic forces, those of Strife and Love- strive drives
apart, love brings together. The pre-human predecessors of the ancient
greeks were said to have worshipped only Kypris, queen of love, and
thus all was in unity and harmony. As time passed and Strife became
more prevalent, both physical reality and souls rended from their
unity. Thus upon finding Love (note the capitalisation) in each other,
two souls again became united as in the days of pre-history that
Empedocles talks about. The origin of the concept of having a single
soul mate lies in Empedocles' idea that these pre-human
Kypris-worshippers were creatures of both male and female sex- upon the
onset of Strife, the male and female parts of each creature were broken
from each other. Finding one's soul mate would require finding that
person which was the original other male or female half of your
pre-human Kypris-worshipping self. Go to
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/e/empedocl.htm#SH4a if you want to read
anything about this bizarre metaphysics.
Thus rooted in thousands of years of myth and in what some ancient
greeks believed to be philosophically correct, lies the formal origin
of true love and soul mates. This probably seems to you, as does to
me, a highly questionable origin to these concepts which has been lost
somewhere over the past two and a half millenia. As Daniel and Nick
have suggested, true love as a form of analogy and also as a part of a
highly complex set of human emotions, experiences, psychology etc seems
far more plausable, though I haven't thought about the issue adequately
to form more than a critical account of what it might be.
Best wishes
Browse or search the BUPS-DIS archives, or unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.bups.org/mailinglist.shtml