[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Home]

RE: "Doing" Epistemology?

To: none of your business <akosua_b@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: "Doing" Epistemology?
From: djf500@york.ac.uk
Date: 07 Oct 2006 21:53:08 +0100
Cc: BUPS-DIS@bups.org
In-reply-to: <BAY106-F12B85AE207077F89D01BBCF0100@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY106-F12B85AE207077F89D01BBCF0100@phx.gbl>

To reply to this message or start a new topic please email: BUPS-DIS@bups.org

Does the suggested counter-example require that we vascillate between direct and indirect application of meta-questions? The question applies to E and then to the rest of phil., rather than to E *and* the rest of phil..

Browse or search the BUPS-DIS archives, or unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.bups.org/mailinglist.shtml

Follow-Ups:
- RE: "Doing" Epistemology?
  - From: "none of your business" <akosua_b@hotmail.com>

References:
- RE: "Doing" Epistemology?
  - From: "none of your business" <akosua_b@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: "Doing" Epistemology?
Next by Date: RE: "Doing" Epistemology?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread