[Bups-dis] Crispin Wright and the Gospel according to St Andrews

[Andrew Turner]

Bonjour y'all


I'm after some fairly specialist help with neofregeanism. Specifically the
accusation that Hume's Principle (N=) is impredicative in a vicious way.
After reading Wright's paper 'the harmless impredicativity of N=' and others
&c I'm not at all sure what it is that Wright is saying against the charge
that the impredicativity of N= blocks its explanatory function, or indeed
what could be said against this challenge.


Help appreciated!


Andrew Turner